Marina Oswald THREATENED THE LIFE of Hugh Aynesworth. Source Hugh Aynesworth 11/29/1966 letter to Hollis McCombs of Life Magazine

 Marina Oswald THREATENED THE LIFE OF HUGH AYNESWORTH.

Source on this: Hugh Aynesworth Nov. 29, 1966 letter to Hollis McCombs of Life Magazine.

Hugh Aynesworth: "I've even received death threats from Europe (and from Marina)."

Hugh Aynesworth had sex with Marina Oswald. Source on this is Hugh Aynesworth to JFK researcher Shirley Martin, 1964: 

http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/A%20Disk/Aynesworth%20Hugh/Item%2001.pdf

Below: Hugh Aynesworth Nov. 29, 1966 letter to Holland McCombs of Life Magazine:

Page 1:

Page 2: (Marina Oswald death threat to Hugh Aynesworth below)

Donald Trump has a ZERO percent chance of winning the 2024 presidential race

 "Donald Trump has a ZERO percent chance of winning the 2024 presidential race" 

by Robert Morrow  - January 21, 2024:

A big reason for that is that in a lot of swing states DEMOCRATS control the governorships, secretary of state positions, legislatures and state Supreme Courts, which means there is no one there in positions of high power in swing states to let Trump CHEAT to win the election. There is no Trump state Supreme Court in these states that will allow him to cheat.

The other big reasons Trump is a sure-fire loser are: 1) Abortion is a huge issue and it is not going away 2) Trump is an election Liar (not merely denier) and he tried to overthrow the government 3) Trump's negatives are rock solid and high and will always be higher than Biden's or Kamala Harris's or any other Democrat's negatives and that is the determinative factor in this race.

So what if 45% or 46% of the country votes for Trump? He is still going to lose the electoral college and he has no one in power to help him cheat to win the swing states. Trump's 47% of the popular vote in the 2020 election is his forever high water mark and he only got that because of the power of incumbency. Biden got 51% of the popular vote in 2020.

Ever heard the expression "Close but no cigar" or "Close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades?"

The best Trump can do is "make it close" but there is an impenetrable barrier to him winning 2024 presidential and that is his rock-solid forever and permanent negative ratings.

A recent NH poll had Biden at a pathetic 38% approval rating and he was still handily beating Trump in a head-to-head race. So what if 25-30% of the USA are hardcore Trump supporters? 53% of the USA permanently and forever totally hates Trump - they are SCARED of Trump - which is why Trump can't win. The GOP base is "angry" but the Democrats and independents are SCARED of Trump and "scared" trumps "angry" in the 2024 U.S. presidential race.

Even if Biden dies while on the ballot, the Democrats will will. Even if Kamala Harris somehow the Demo nominee the Democrats will win. Normally, if the economy collapses the opposition party will ease win a presidential race. Not so in 2024 where Trump's completely toxic high negatives will "trump" any sour economic news. Trump's revolting and criminal behavior has made the Democratic party bullet proof in presidential elections.

The coin flip for the 2024 election reads on one side "Democrats will win" and on the other side "Donald Trump will lose."

The only way Joe Biden could lose the presidential race would be to publicly do something so criminal, revolting and disgusting that would cause voters NOT to vote for him even if they would never vote for Trump. Biden would have to do something like chainsaw puppies up into little pieces on the White House lawn or rape a 4-year-old boy in the ass on the White House lawn in order for Trump to have a CHANCE of winning. 

Biden, wearing diapers and drooling from the mouth and smoking crack with Hunter Biden on the White House lawn would not be enough for Trump to actually win the election.

The odds of Biden actually doing something so evil and criminal and disgusting in a public place are so low that Donald Trump effectively has a ZERO percent chance of winning the 2024 presidential election.

Sincerely,

Robert Morrow        Austin, TX    512-306-1510

"The World's Leading Public Intellectual"

Jackie Kennedy's Cartoon's prove she knew all about Lyndon Johnson's and Sam Rayburn's Blackmail of JFK at the 1960 Democratic convention

 Jackie Kennedy’s cartoons from the 1960 campaign show a cartoon of “Texans” Lyndon Johnson and Sam Rayburn shaking hands with JFK and the big Texan LBJ is squeezing a tiny frail JFK’s hand to the point that it hurts:

 https://www.thedailybeast.com/jackie-kennedys-jfk-cartoons-1

 Hat tip to author Sean Fetter who pointed this out in his book Under Cover of Night: The United States Air Force and the Assassination of John F. Kennedy

 That means Jackie knew all about the threats and blackmail tactics that LBJ and Sam Rayburn used to force JFK to Johnson on the 1960 Demo ticket as VP

The above cartoon shows two burly Texas Rangers strong arming a skinny, weak John F. Kennedy. Those two big, burly, dominating Texas Rangers are Lyndon Johnson in the middle and Sam Rayburn on the left. Lyndon Johnson is shown not just shaking JFK's hand but rather "crushing" JFK's hand to the point of pain. This 1960 campaign cartoon by Jackie proves that she knew all about the blackmailing that LBJ and Sam Rayburn did on John Kennedy to force JFK to include Lyndon Johnson on the 1960 Democratic ticket as Vice President.

JFK is in a rush to get on an airplane and he is with his daughter Caroline who obviously does not want him to go.

JFK is giving a speech in the above Jackie cartoon

The Jackie cartoon above makes fun of how skinny JFK was

Lone Nutter Kryptonite: "5 feet 10 inches, 165 pounds" - Absolute proof Lee Harvey Oswald was a pre-selected patsy for the JFK assassination

       What I am relaying is no original research of mine; I found out about this through the stellar research of Bill Simpich. And beyond that, this material has been out in the JFK research community for decades.

      The following is absolute proof that Lee Harvey Oswald was a "pre-selected patsy" for the JFK assassination and that the Dallas Police were trying to frame Oswald for the murder of JFK starting at 12:44PM on 11/22/63, a mere 14 minutes after JFK was shot in the head on Elm Street.

      Here is my blog post on this topic: 

1) https://robertmorrowpoliticalresearchblog.blogspot.com/2023/01/5-feet-10-inches-165-pounds-is-absolute.html  

2) In May of 1960, Marguerite Oswald told Dallas FBI agent John Fain that her son Lee was "5 feet 10 inches, 165 pounds." This is in the John Fain FBI memo dated May 12, 1960 https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=95569#relPageId=145  

3) On 12/05/1961 an INS document was created describing Oswald as "5 feet 10 inches, 165 pounds" https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=110676#relPageId=76&search=Fysa 

4) On 10/10/1963, a CIA document by C. Bustos was created and it described Oswald at "5 feet 10 inches, 165 pounds" https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=110013#relPageId=2 

        Fast forward to 11/22/1963 the Dallas Police Dispatcher starting at 12:44PM issued alerts to look for a suspect who was "5 feet 10 inches, 165 pounds" at 12:44PM, 12:47PM, 12:50PM, 12:56PM and finally at 1:09PM - that comes out 5 alerts (all points bulletins) with 25 minutes (12:44PM and ending at 1:09PM)

         Based on all that a reasonable person can conclude that the Dallas Police within minutes of the JFK assassination were using Marguerite Oswald's own May, 1960 physical description of her son Lee (who wanted to be just like Herbert Philbrick and catch communists and who loved and adored John Kennedy) to frame Oswald for the JFK assassination.

Now that we know with absolute certainty that the fix was in, that Oswald was a pre-selected patsy for the JFK assassination and that the Dallas Police were full on trying to frame him for JFK's murder within 14 minutes of JFK being shot, it means everything else that is presented as "evidence" by the Dallas police, the FBI or the Warren Commission to indict Oswald is immediately suspect and must be held to extremely high standards or even presumed to be completely fraudulent and fabricated evidence by the authorities. This especially applies to any attempt to blame Oswald for the murder of Officer J.D. Tippit or the 4/10/1963 shooting attempt on Gen. Edwin Walker.

     All because we know the authorities were immediately trying to frame Oswald for the JFK assassination.

       Whenever I bring up these absolutely unimpeachable facts to Lone Nutters, I  am almost always met with silence. That is because the evidence presented above (no original research of mine) is all verified, documented and unimpeachable.

Sincerely,

Robert Morrow      512-306-1510      Austin, TX